Saturday, April 20, 2002

Zero Tolerance and Birth control

A while ago I asked about asked about schools with "zero tolerance" policies and contraceptive distribution (in the footnote, at the end of the post).

It appears that at least one does give out birth control medication. If anyone can tell me about Somerville High's discipline policies, I'd appreciate it.

Teens Get 'Morning After Pill' For Free Students at Somerville High School are aware of it. A push to educate teens at the school has lead to an average of five students inquiring about emergency contraception at the school clinic each week.
After seeing a health practitioner at the center, students can get the pills, called Plan B, for free.


I love that--"Plan B." I bet the school that offers Plan B doesn't spend a whole lot of time on Plan A[bstinence]. There's an email circulating about things you ahve to believe to be a democrat. One of them goes something like "You have to believe that the third grade teacher who can't teach your kid to read is qualified to teach him about sex."

Friday, April 19, 2002

Ground Zero

You will find little here that can be called original, and would do well to skip this blog entirely, if you’ve already “moved on.” But I made my first trip to Ground Zero a few days ago, and I need to express a little of that moment. I have been to the City 8 or 9 times since September, but had not been required to go downtown, and hadn’t volunteered either.

I actually happened on it by accident: I know that sounds improbable, but it’s true. I got out of a cab at City Hall, an hour early for a meeting on Wall Street, intending to walk the last 1/2 mile. My tourist map of Manhattan was in the briefcase, and I honestly didn’t know quite how close to the WTC site City Hall sits. Off to my right, a blank spot in the sky suggested the proximity. This in itself is amazing. One looks at the spot where the Towers stood and understands immediately that no gap in the Manhattan skyline can be that large on its own. Someone has clearly done something to the skyline, and only one thing could do that much.

St. Paul’s chapel attracted my attention, and gradually it dawned on me that it was surrounded by banners and memorials, and posters of the missing and dead. It is very hard to describe the way in which this recognition snuck up on me, as did the banners themselves. Without planning or deliberation, I had crossed the street and was reading them before I had even fully acknowledged them. Heading along the North side of the chapel, peering into the graveyard as much as looking at the signs, I discovered that I had arrived at police barriers, and was gazing upon the site. I closed my eyes, bowed my head, and silently prayed. At so many points along this short walk, I found myself on the edge of tears, scabbed-over wounds suddenly threatening to bleed again. The moment of prayer was the only time in my life I have ever felt utter silence in a city.

Startling things still live in the plaza, though most of the site now looks like an ordinary construction zone. Tall cranes and great shovels poke above the trailers that line the East edge of the site, and surprise you by depositing rubble instead of landfill into dump trucks. One skyscraper along the southern edge is entirely covered in black cloth, as though shrouded in mourning, a sign of gratitude and an American flag the only interruptions of its monolithic sadness. A building to the West, next to St. Paul’s, still has many panes of glass replaced with plywood. Somehow, in all that, the thing hardest to process was how dirty the windows of the buildings remain. No window washers have scaled the facades since September 11, and so the dust of the Towers and the airplanes and the workers and the firemen and the passengers and the police and the EMS teams and the terrorists still coats the glass. Who will be the one to wash away the dust?

Around a corner, large crates of marble sit, presumably for the restoration of a lobby. I find that hopeful. But up that same street, papers and soot still clog a storm drain.

I cannot count myself among those who think such visits ghoulish or inappropriate. My own visit lasted half an hour or 45 minutes, and in that time I saw others who were crying, or praying, or taking pictures. I want to be reminded, however much it hurts, of what I felt when it first happened. I want to remember, so long as the enemies of freedom and civilization still cower in their caves, and hide in “refugee camps” behind women and children. While they strap dynamite to their young and use civilians as missiles, I have no interest in forgetting. It is not a memorial, and I do not wish to make it one. It remains a present, active outrage.

Regulation's costs

Tight Water Standards May Be Cause of Pipe Leaks (washingtonpost.com) "After 18 months of study, an expert investigating a rash of tiny but expensive leaks in copper plumbing pipes in Montgomery and Prince George's counties said he believes he has made progress in identifying the cluster of factors that could be causing the problem...Edwards said his research leads him to stand by his original theory that tighter federal water quality standards have contributed to leaks in WSSC customer pipes...Nor does he believe any utility could anticipate interactions that might occur from changes in federal rules combined with different chemicals used in treatment, filtration or relining." [emphasis supplied]


Isn't that last the fundamental problem with the usurpation of state power by Washington?

An Odd Accusation

Interesting op-ed in yesterday's NY Times. It seems the Republican mayor of New York has nominated an African-American man to serve the city in a prominent role. A group of black city workers is angry, accusing the man of having neither "the know-how nor the desire to address those issues that affect our communities of color."

A columnist for the Times takes up the nominee's case. "It was a false and disgusting and dangerous charge. It was a charge with no merit at all, no basis in fact. It came out of nowhere," he writes.

As Warner Wolf might put it: if you guessed that the columnist was Bill Safire, you lost! It was yesterday's Bob Herbert column. I know absolutely nothing about the nominee or his critics (in the group calling itself "100 Blacks in Law Enforcement Who Care"). I am completely and utterly uninformed, and therefore agnostic, on Ray Kelly's nomination.

What is interesting is the quickness of Bob Herbert to call the charge "false and disgusting and dangerous." When Herbert took up the nomination of Charles Pickering to the US Court of Appeals, he had this to say: "Judge Pickering, a close friend of Senator Trent Lott, is a right-winger whose views over many decades have been insensitive, and frequently hostile, to the rights of minorities, the disenfranchised, the poor and women." In the same column (Feb. 7th, not available for free at the Times' website) he tries to associate Pickering with various racist groups, including the Mississippi Sovereignty Commission. The vitriol is palpable: "Judge Pickering has been antagonistic to...voting rights." "Pickering's nomination is an affront to black people." "Pickering's racist past."

I guess false and disgusting charges are only dangerous when the guy being picked on is your guy.

John Miller and others at "The Corner"
CIA IN VENEZUELA

Robert: At some level, I hope the CIA was involved in the Venezuela coup--at least in the sense that they were on top of events, rather than disconnected from them. This is far different from saying they "stage-managed" the coup, as some have suggested. What amuses me is how the Left--without a shred of evidence--assumes the CIA was down there doing bad things.

Am I the only person who wishes the CIA were even half as competent as the left seems to believe it to be?